Discussion on the Relationship between DeSci and MeMe Coin: Balancing Innovation and Speculation

Recently, the topics of decentralized science (DeSci) and meme coins (MeMe币) have sparked widespread discussion in the crypto community. From the emergence of various imitation projects to the new developments of established DeSci projects, and the market's reaction to the DeSci narrative, the entire ecosystem exhibits complex interactions.

There is a view that DeSci in 2024 may replicate the glory of DeFi in 2019. This statement has inspired many cross-industry individuals, especially those who are involved in both research and the crypto field. For some, the MeMe币 with positive externalities seems to be full of a sense of justice.

However, what we need to consider is whether MeMe coin really needs positive externalities like DeSci? There is a viewpoint that the essence of MeMe coin is a digital lottery of the 2020s, providing the younger generation with an opportunity to participate in wealth redistribution without the need for additional significance.

From another perspective, MeMe coin trading is essentially a market for attention tokenization, following the laws of communication. A good narrative, whether emphasizing positive externalities or cultivating a specific culture, can serve as an effective medium for social media dissemination. From this angle, DeSci indeed provides a good opportunity for MeMe coin to engage in a collaborative honor market.

So, does DeSci need the wealth effect and market attention brought by MeMe coin? The answer is yes. As a relatively niche field, despite the support of some well-known institutions and individuals, DeSci projects have always been viewed by the market as a niche demand, failing to attract mainstream funding.

Can DeSci become a disruptive innovation like DeFi? There is some hope for this question. From the perspective of the philosophy of science, science is not only about truth but also involves power structures, especially the distribution of power within the scientific community. Whether it is research DAOs or new fundraising models, they are all attempting to challenge and innovate the existing power structures of the scientific community.

Although the development prospects of DeSci are promising, we must also recognize that it lacks a high degree of financial attributes compared to DeFi. DeSci lacks the characteristics of composability and leveraged cycles, which makes it difficult to quickly create massive new assets like DeFi.

Overall, the combination of DeSci and MeMe coin reflects a delicate balance between innovation and speculation. While this combination may bring about some positive changes, we also need to remain vigilant to avoid the negative impacts caused by excessive speculation. In the future, the development path of DeSci may need to find a balance between scientific innovation and market dynamics.